General Information
Equipment and Methods
Sampling and Effort
Visual | Capture | |
---|---|---|
Sampling regime: | annually | annually |
Measure of effort: | unknown | cap/area |
Captures and Sightings Information
Species | No. of Captures |
No. of Sightings |
Min Size* (cm) |
Max Size* (cm) |
Mean Size* (cm) |
FP Observed |
Life Stages** | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Green Turtle (Cm) | n/a | 979 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
Loggerhead (Cc) | n/a | 191 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
Kemp's Ridley (Lk) | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
Hawksbill (Ei) | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
Leatherback (Dc) | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
** For Cm, Cc, Lk, & Ei: O - Oceanic-stage juvenile; N - Neritic-stage juvenile; S - Subadult; A - Adult. For Dc: I - Immature; A - Adult. n/a = not applicable; n/r = not reported.
This report adheres to the following size ranges for life stage classification for these species:
Green turtle | Loggerhead | Kemp's ridley | Hawksbill | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oceanic-stage juvenile | < 25 cm SCL | < 30 cm SCL | < 25 cm SCL | < 25 cm SCL |
Neritic-stage juvenile | 25-69 cm SCL | 30-69 cm SCL | 25-39 cm SCL | 25-64 cm SCL |
Subadult | 70-84 cm SCL | 70-79 cm SCL | 40-59 cm SCL | 65-74 cm SCL |
Adult | ≥ 85 cm SCL | ≥ 80 cm SCL | ≥ 60 cm SCL | ≥ 75 cm SCL |
Leatherback | |
---|---|
Immature | < 135 cm OCL |
Adult | ≥ 135 cm OCL |
Other Information Collected
Project Summary
This study was initially a four-year effort to determine the effects of a beach-renourishment project on sea turtle abundances in the area and to describe the distribution of turtles in the nearshore reefs off Indian River County. It is now continuing as a population-monitoring project. Three study areas were defined, one of which was affected by the renourishment project. Within each area, three 3-km transects were established parallel to the beach at 300, 600, and 1200 feet offshore. Surfacing turtles were counted by observers on a tower onboard a small boat. Green turtles made up the majority of overall sightings. Loggerheads were more abundant in the offshore transects than in those close to shore, while green turtles were generally found closer to shore. The vast majority of turtles in each year were sighted in the northern study area of the county, where the renourishment occurred. A comparison of turtle abundance before and after the renourishment project revealed slightly higher numbers in 2005 than before the project.
Documents
No documents uploaded.
Literature/Reports Produced
Inwater Research Group, Inc. 2005. Indian River County sectors 1 & 2 beach restoration in-water sea turtle distribution and abundance monitoring. Third annual report submitted to FWC, 22 pp. |
Inwater Research Group. Sept. 2006. Indian River County sectors 1&2 renourishment in-water sea turtle distribution and abundance monitoring, preconstruction monitoring report. Report submitted to FWC, 21 pp. |
Inwater Research Group. Sept. 2007. Indian River County sectors 1&2 renourishment in-water sea turtle distribution and abundance monitoring, interim postconstruction monitoring report. Report submitted to FWC, 23 pp. |
Inwater Research Group. Sept. 2007. IR County sectors 3 proposed restoration in-water sea turtle distribution and abundance monitoring, preconstruction baseline monitoring report. Report submitted to Coastal Technology Corporation, Vero Beach, FL, 23 pp |
Inwater Research Group. Sept. 2007. IR County sectors 7 initial restoration in-water sea turtle distribution and abundance monitoring, postconstruction monitoring report. Report submitted to FWC, 21 pp. |
Inwater Research Group. September 2008. Indian River County sectors 1&2 renourishment in-water sea turtle distribution and abundance monitoring, first year postconstruction monitoring report. Report submitted to FWC, 21 pp. |
Inwater Research Group. September 2008. Indian River County sectors 7 initial restoration in-water sea turtle distribution and abundance monitoring, second year postconstruction monitoring report. Report submitted to FWC, 21 pp. |
Inwater Research Group. October 2009. Indian River County sectors 1&2 renourishment in-water sea turtle distribution and abundance monitoring, second year postconstruction monitoring report. Report submitted to FWC, 19 pp |
Inwater Research Group. January 2010. Indian River County sectors 7 initial restoration in-water sea turtle distribution and abundance monitoring, 2009 post-construction monitoring report. Report submitted to FWC, 20 pp. |